We independently evaluate all of our recommendations. If you click on links we provide, we may receive compensation.

I Roasted 8 Chickens and 20 Pounds of Potatoes to Find the Best Roasting Pans

Our top picks are from Cuisinart and All-Clad.

By
Taylor Murray
Taylor Murray
Serious Eats Contributor

Taylor is a regular contributor and product tester for Serious Eats. She has worked in the food industry for 15 years, including 10 as a line cook at some of the best restaurants in the world. 

Learn about Serious Eats' Editorial Process
Updated November 22, 2024
A selection of roasting pans we tested

Serious Eats / Russell Kilgore

Straight to the Point

The best roasting pan is from Cuisinart. It has a flat bottom that evenly roasts vegetables and a rack that perfectly cradles chicken or turkey. Our favorite flared roasting pan was the All-Clad Stainless Steel Flared Roasting Pan. Its angled edges made for easy flipping and pouring.

When it comes time to cook a large roast for, say, a big holiday gathering, many opt to use a cheap, disposable aluminum tray. Hey, I can’t knock it! The clean-up is zilch and it does the job adequately. However, these flimsy pans are prone to collapsing under the weight of hefty proteins, and you can forget about deglazing one to make a pan sauce or gravy. 

That’s why I prefer a dedicated roasting pan. It’s a regular sight in restaurant kitchens where cooks are used to pulling off complex recipes, like roasting veal bones and deglazing with wine to make demi-glace. Try doing that in a disposable aluminum pan. While this may seem like a bulky addition to your cookware collection, when you need one, it is difficult to replace.

Roasting pans come in a variety of sizes, shapes, and materials, so which should you go for? I tested eight of them to find out.

The Tests

A whole chicken on the rack of a roasting pan.
To find the best roasting pans, I used each to roast a whole chicken and make a pan sauce.

Serious Eats / Taylor Murray

  • Roasted Chicken and Pan Sauce Test: To see how well each pan did at roasting a simple chicken, I followed our roast chicken recipe, skipping the steps for browning the bird in a pan first. After the chicken was done, I set the pan over a burner and deglazed it with broth and butter, scraping the bottom with a whisk to loosen any bits of fond.
  • Roasted Potato Test: To determine if the roasting pans could also be used for cooking vegetables, I halved two pounds of Yukon gold potatoes and roasted them with olive oil. I checked to see how evenly the potatoes browned and how easy they were to flip.
  • Water Bath Test: To see how well each pan could be used as a water bath (common for baked goods like bread pudding or custard), I placed our favorite glass baking dish in each roasting pan. I added water to the pan until it reached the halfway point on the dish, then picked up the roasting pan and carried it around to see if it caused splashing or usability issues.
  • Turkey Test: Any good roasting pan should be able to accommodate a whole turkey. I placed an 11-pound turkey in each roasting pan and checked to see if it would securely fit on the included rack if it had one. I then picked up the pan and carried it around, evaluating how easy it was to do so. 

What We Learned

Angled or Curved Roasting Racks Were Preferable

A whole chicken in a roasting pan in the oven.
Angled racks (as shown here) perfectly cradled poultry, ensuring it didn't move around.

Serious Eats / Taylor Murray

A few of the roasting pans I tested either had no rack or flat racks. The flat racks were tricky to use, as raw chicken and turkey slipped around when I moved the pan into the oven. Roasting pans that had a curved or angled rack were better. Birds didn’t budge an inch during multiple moves from oven to stovetop to table. Depending on the shape, these angled racks can leave enough room to stuff vegetables or aromatics underneath. The upward-angled handles were easier to grab and lift too. 

Straight Sides vs. Flared Sides

A person whisk stock in a roasting pan.
Straight-sided roasting pans contained liquid better, as we found when making pan sauces.

Serious Eats / Taylor Murray

Straight-sided roasting pans hold more liquid—around two quarts more on average. That gives you added versatility. For example, you could roast vegetables in the pan, add water, and make a vegetable stock without transferring it to a pot. Straight-sided roasting pans also came with more raised, angled racks that allowed air to circulate thoroughly around poultry, so there was still decent browning. 

Does that mean that flared pans weren’t good? Not at all. This design had a few advantages. While the volume might be lower, the flared edges offered more maneuverability when using a spatula or spoon to flip vegetables. The flared sides allowed air to circulate around the food, helping with even cooking and browning. For those who don’t foresee themselves making recipes requiring a high volume of liquid, a flared roasting pan is absolutely worth considering.

Skip the Channel

Roasted potatoes in a roasting pan.
You wouldn't get this kind of even browning in a pan with a channel.

Serious Eats / Taylor Murray

Some roasting pans come with a channel that runs around the perimeter. Paired with a slightly elevated surface, this allows excess fat or grease to move away from what’s roasting in the center. However, I found channels hindered optimal results when I made roast vegetables and gravy. When roasting the potatoes, the oil slipped away from the tubers and into the channel, leading to less browning. When I tried to make gravy, the whisk could not glide smoothly over the surface to whisk up fond; my chicken stock also pooled in the channel, leading me to use more stock than I wanted to cover the pan’s surface. 

Bigger Handles, Better Grip

A person picking up a roasting pan.
Roomy handles were a must on a roasting pan. That way, they could be securely gripped—important for moving heavy roasts.

Serious Eats / Taylor Murray

When it comes to roasting pans, wide, looped handles that you can securely grip are crucial, as you may be carrying heavy roasts with plenty of hot grease that risks spilling and burning. Handles that were at least four inches wide and two to three inches deep were roomy enough for my hands plus pot holders or thick kitchen towels. I preferred square handles to round ones, as my hands moved around less with the former.

The roasting pans I tested ran the gamut with handles that bent out, bent in, or went straight up. The ones that bent out were bulkier and could be troublesome if you have a smaller-than-average oven, while handles that bent in could interfere if you’re packing your pan with a large roast. Straight handles avoided both of these pitfalls.

Stainless Steel Was Superior

A stainless roasting pan.
Stainless steel roasting pans are preferable for their versatility and ease—and minimal maintenance.

Serious Eats / Taylor Murray

I only tested one carbon steel roasting pan but did not prefer it to stainless steel. Not only does carbon steel need to be seasoned before use, but it’s sensitive to acidic ingredients which are often used to roast veal, lamb, and beef bones when making stocks and jus, and often pop up in red meat braises and stews. For this reason, choosing a carbon steel roasting pan will limit the versatility of a pan that you’re already only going to break out once in a while. Stainless steel offers none of these challenges.

The Criteria: What to Look for in a Roasting Pan

A whole chicken roasting in a roasting pan.

Serious Eats / Taylor Murray

By and large, I preferred the durability and easy cleanup of a stainless steel roasting pan. The edge of the pan should have a slightly curved lip to make pouring easy, and it should include large, looped handles that you can grip with or without a towel or oven mitts. Skip any with a channel around the bottom of the pan, which makes both roasting and gravy-making more difficult. Look for a pan that has an included angled or curved rack that is rated for use at a high temperature. A rack made of stainless steel will have more durability and longevity compared to one that’s nonstick-coated.

Our Favorite Roasting Pans

What we liked: This pan produced top-notch roasting and searing results. After the chicken, I was easily able to dislodge fond for a pan sauce, and the pan’s rim had a slightly flared edge for drip-free pouring. I found the pan’s nine-quart volume to be more than adequate—deep enough to hold a water bath or simmer a stock. The rack lifted the chicken high out of the pan, so as to not interfere with browning, and it left plenty of room underneath for adding aromatics or vegetables, if desired. The rack easily fit an 11-pound turkey and the handles were wide and easy to grip.

What we didn’t like: There wasn’t much I didn’t like about this roasting pan. Technically, the manufacturer discourages the use of metal utensils to preserve the bright chrome finish, but I didn’t note any damage after whisking in it.

Key Specs

  • Material: Stainless steel clad with an aluminum core
  • Weight: 7 pounds, 11 ounces
  • Capacity: 9 quarts
  • Dimensions: 20.75 x 6.25 x 13.25 inches
  • Dishwasher-safe?: Yes

What we liked: Another great pan from my testing was the All-Clad Stainless Steel Flared, which produced supremely caramelized potatoes and a golden brown chicken that rivaled any rotisserie bird. After cooking the chicken, I was easily able to whisk the pan sauce, thanks to the pan’s rounded, sloping corners. During the turkey carrying test, there was plenty of room for an 11-pound bird, with more space available for a much larger roast as well. After testing, the All-Clad was easy to clean, though Bar Keepers Friend and a scouring pad will be your friend for removing baked-on bits.

What we didn't like: The flat rack didn’t do much to hold onto the raw chicken or turkey, and I experienced some sliding when moving the pan from the stovetop to the oven. The volume is a few quarts less than our winner, so I wouldn’t recommend attempting any soups or stocks.

Key Specs

  • Material: Stainless steel
  • Weight: 5 pounds, 4 ounces
  • Capacity: 6 quarts
  • Dimensions: 16.75 x 13.75 x 2.5 inches
  • Dishwasher-safe?: Yes

What we liked: A hybrid between a sheet pan and a conventional roasting pan, the Misen has low sides that allow for maximum air circulation. Its riveted, wide, straight handles are incredibly easy to grab, even with the bulkiest oven mitts. “It solves just about every problem I've listed for both roasting pans and baking sheets, making it the first roasting pan I'd actually recommend without hesitation,” Daniel writes. “Another great detail of Misen's roasting pan is it's sized just like a standard rimmed baking sheet (technically a ‘half-sheet pan’ size), which means it can fit any wire rack you already own for your rimmed baking sheets, no need to get an extra rack just for the roasting pan.”

What we didn’t like: Its handles are high, which makes them easy to accidentally graze. It doesn’t come with a rack and has short sides, so you won’t be able to use a lot of liquid in it.

Key Specs

  • Material: Stainless steel
  • Weight: 6 pounds, 14.4 ounces
  • Capacity: 2.5 quarts
  • Dimensions: 19.5 x 13 x 1.5 inches
  • Dishwasher-safe?: Yes
The Misen roasting pan with fond in it after roasting a whole chicken.

Serious Eats / Taylor Murary

The Competition

  • Anolon Triply Clad Stainless Steel Roasting Pan: The channel around the pan’s perimeter prevented even browning on the potatoes and made it hard to whisk a pan sauce.
  • Viking Culinary 3-Ply Stainless Roasting Pan: This pan was almost a winner but the bottom was slightly domed in the center, which made making a pan sauce harder.
  • All-Clad Stainless Steel Roasting Pan: The rack is nonstick but not rated as highly as the pan itself, so I was forced to skip using it to roast the chicken. The channel on the bottom interfered with potatoes browning, rendering them pale and flavorless.
  • Williams Sonoma Thermoclad Roasting Pan: The handles are too small to be comfortable, but it’s otherwise a well-made pan that rivaled the winning All-Clad Flared pan.
  • Made In Carbon Steel Roasting Pan: I like the idea of a carbon steel roaster, but despite the products' marketing claims, this particular pan was too small to accommodate an 11-pound turkey without parts sticking over the sides, and the potatoes I cooked in it did not brown properly. 

FAQs

What type of pan is best for roasting?

In my opinion, a straight-sided stainless steel roasting pan with a V-shaped or curved rack is the best pan for roasting. This type of pan works equally well at cooking large roasts, caramelizing vegetables, and making a pan sauce.

What’s the difference between a roasting pan and a baking pan?

A roasting pan and a baking pan serve different purposes and have distinct features. Roasting pans are generally larger and deeper with high sides, designed to accommodate larger cuts of meat and whole poultry. They often come with racks to elevate the food, allowing heat to circulate evenly for uniform cooking. Baking pans are usually shallower and come in a variety of shapes and sizes, such as rectangular, square, or round, and they’re tailored for baking cakes, cookies, casseroles, and other baked goods for which the primary goal is even heat distribution and containment of batter or other mixtures.

What’s the point of a roasting pan?

The point of a roasting pan is mainly to roast larger cuts of meat, like whole turkeys, standing rib roasts, or racks of lamb. This is especially true if you plan to make a pan sauce or gravy after the meat is done. While you could get away with an alternative tool to make these things, a roasting pan is specially designed to accommodate these types of recipes and should be large enough for even the biggest cut of meats or sauciest sauces.

What can I use instead of a roasting pan?

Depending on the type of recipe, there are several things you can use instead of a roasting pan. For roasting vegetables, a rimmed baking sheet should do nicely. You can roast a chicken on a rimmed baking sheet, in a carbon steel or cast iron skillet, or in a deep Dutch oven. For larger proteins like a standing rib roast or turkey, you might need to get an aluminum roasting pan to pull off the job. 

Why We’re the Experts

  • Taylor Murray has been working in food and food media for over 10 years, including in award-winning restaurants. She has written extensively for Serious Eats. 
  • Taylor tested eight roasting pans, making a whole chicken in each, as well as two pounds of potatoes. She used the pan as a water bath with a glass baking dish and saw how well each could fit a turkey.

More Serious Eats Recipes