Frank's RedHot vs. Buffalo Style Tabasco Pepper Sauce | Taste Test

By
J. Kenji López-Alt
Kenji Lopez Alt
Culinary Consultant
Kenji is the former culinary director for Serious Eats and a current culinary consultant for the site. He is also a New York Times food columnist and the author of The Food Lab: Better Home Cooking Through Science.
Learn about Serious Eats' Editorial Process
Updated August 10, 2018
20120131-franks-vs-tabasco-primary2.jpg
Robyn Lee

Back when we conducted our Buffalo Sauce Tasting last Super Bowl season, the world's leading hot sauce brand—Tabasco—didn't have a true contender on the market. Their standard hot sauce is far too spicy and thin to be considered for a buffalo sauce taste test.

Well this year, they've come up with a competitor.

For the first time, Tabasco has expanded their lineup to include a Buffalo Style Hot Sauce, that is, a thicker, milder version of their flagship hot sauce specifically aimed to compete with Frank's (the winner of our tasting).

Like Frank's, its ingredient list is minimal, kept to peppers, salt, water, vinegar, and garlic. So how does it stack up?

I acted as cook and vote collector only (yeah, I know—this wasn't a double-blind test, but it was single blind), frying up a couple pounds of chicken wings and tossing them in their respective sauces made from equal parts hot sauce and unsalted butter. Off the bat, the Tabasco is a deeper, darker red with a thicker texture that is slightly more difficult to emulsify (see the grease pools of butter?), but did a better job at sticking to its wings.

Flavorwise, the vote was tied.

Those who liked the Frank's preferred its cleaner, brighter flavor. "Tastes fresher," and "like real chilis," were most people's comments. Many also mentioned that it was exactly what came to mind when they thought of Buffalo wings. On the contrary, what came to my mind when I thought of Buffalo wings was simply how much I wanted to eat them. I compensated by taking deep whiffs of the vinegary-hot aromas drifting up from their bowls (I suppose that actually counts as cheating in my veganism).

The Tabasco, on the other hand, had its own group of supporters who found that its flavor was richer and fruitier. "There's something going on in there," was the way Ed put it—as if it had been aged longer, perhaps.

After the wings were gone I personally tasted the hot sauces side-by-side straight out of the bottle (since I can't have the butter in the mixed sauces) and found myself torn. On the one hand, I really appreciated the complexity of the Tabasco version—it had fruity, almost raisin-like flavors to it and a nice, gentle heat. The Frank's, on the other hand, is like an old friend to me. Simple, but reliable in his tanginess.

Final Vote?

It's a dead heat (or should I say tangy heat?). You can't really go wrong with either, it's just a matter of personal taste. Better yet, how about you get both and let your guests decide.

More Serious Eats Recipes